Issue

Vol. 11 (2019)

Recent Progress on Engineering Highly Efficient Porous Semiconductor Photocatalysts Derived from Metal–Organic Frameworks

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-018-0235-z
Wenwen Zhan
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Green Synthetic Chemistry for Functional Materials, Department of Chemistry, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, People’s Republic of China
Liming Sun
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Green Synthetic Chemistry for Functional Materials, Department of Chemistry, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, People’s Republic of China
Xiguang Han
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Green Synthetic Chemistry for Functional Materials, Department of Chemistry, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, People’s Republic of China

Corresponding Author: Xiguang Han

xghan@jsnu.edu.cn

Nano-Micro Letters, Vol. 11 (2019), Article Number: 1

Abstract

Porous structures offer highly accessible surfaces and rich pores, which facilitate the exposure of numerous active sites for photocatalytic reactions, leading to excellent performances. Recently, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have been considered ideal precursors for well-designed semiconductors with porous structures and/or heterostructures, which have shown enhanced photocatalytic activities. In this review, we summarize the recent development of porous structures, such as metal oxides and metal sulfides, and their heterostructures, derived from MOF-based materials as catalysts for various light-driven energy-/environment-related reactions, including water splitting, CO2 reduction, organic redox reaction, and pollution degradation. A summary and outlook section is also included.


Highlights:


1 In this review, we survey the recent developments in the fabrication of metal–organic framework (MOF)-derived porous semiconductor photocatalysts toward four kinds of energy-/environment-related reactions.
2 A comprehensive summary of highly efficient MOF-derived photocatalysts, particularly porous metal oxides and metal sulfides, and their heterostructures are provided.
3 Enhanced photocatalytic performance achieved with MOF-derived porous heterostructures as the photocatalyst is discussed in detail.

Keywords

Metal–organic frameworks Derivatives Porous structure Photocatalysis
Zhan, Wenwen, Liming Sun, and Xiguang Han. 2019. “Recent Progress on Engineering Highly Efficient Porous Semiconductor Photocatalysts Derived from Metal–Organic Frameworks”. Nano-Micro Letters 11 (January):1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-018-0235-z.
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. M.R. Hoffmann, S.T. Martin, W.Y. Choi, D.W. Bahnemann, Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 95(1), 69–96 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00033a004
  2. M.A. Fox, M.T. Dulay, Heterogeneous photocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 93(1), 341–357 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00017a016
  3. A. Mills, S. LeHunte, An overview of semiconductor photocatalysis. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 108(1), 1–35 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-6030(97)00118-4
  4. R. Asahi, T. Morikawa, T. Ohwaki, K. Aoki, Y. Taga, Visible-light photocatalysis in nitrogen-doped titanium oxides. Science 293(5528), 269–271 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1061051
  5. S. Sakthivel, H. Kisch, Daylight photocatalysis by carbon-modified titanium dioxide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42(40), 4908–4911 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200351577
  6. H. Tong, S. Ouyang, Y. Bi, N. Umezawa, M. Oshikiri, J. Ye, Nano-photocatalytic materials: possibilities and challenges. Adv. Mater. 24(2), 229–251 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201102752
  7. S. Linic, P. Christopher, D.B. Ingram, Plasmonic-metal nanostructures for efficient conversion of solar to chemical energy. Nat. Mater. 10(12), 911–921 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3151
  8. M. Ni, M.K.H. Leung, D.Y.C. Leung, K. Sumathy, A review and recent developments in photocatalytic water-splitting using TiO2 for hydrogen production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 11(3), 401–425 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2005.01.009
  9. W. Tu, Y. Zhou, Z. Zou, Photocatalytic conversion of CO2 into renewable hydrocarbon fuels: state-of-the-art accomplishment, challenges, and prospects. Adv. Mater. 26(27), 4607–4626 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201400087
  10. R. Marschall, Semiconductor composites: strategies for enhancing charge carrier separation to improve photocatalytic activity. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24(17), 2421–2440 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201303214
  11. K. Maeda, K. Domen, Photocatalytic water splitting: recent progress and future challenges. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 1(18), 2655–2661 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/jz1007966
  12. C.-F. Du, Q. Liang, R. Dangol, J. Zhao, H. Ren, S. Madhavi, Q. Yan, Layered trichalcogenidophosphate: a new catalyst family for water splitting. Nano Micro Lett. 10(4), 67 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-018-0220-6
  13. T. Su, Q. Shao, Z. Qin, Z. Guo, Z. Wu, Role of interfaces in two-dimensional photocatalyst for water splitting. ACS Catal. 8(3), 2253–2276 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b03437
  14. C.B. Ong, L.Y. Ng, A.W. Mohammad, A review of ZnO nanoparticles as solar photocatalysts: synthesis, mechanisms and applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 81, 536–551 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.020
  15. S.G. Kumar, K.S.R.K. Rao, Zinc oxide based photocatalysis: tailoring surface-bulk structure and related interfacial charge carrier dynamics for better environmental applications. RSC Adv. 5(5), 3306–3351 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA13299H
  16. K.M. Lee, C.W. Lai, K.S. Ngai, J.C. Juan, Recent developments of zinc oxide based photocatalyst in water treatment technology: a review. Water Res. 88, 428–448 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.09.045
  17. E. Rahmanian, R. Malekfar, M. Pumera, Nanohybrids of two-dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenides and titanium dioxide for photocatalytic applications. Chem. Eur. J. 24(1), 18–31 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201703434
  18. B. Chen, Y. Meng, J. Sha, C. Zhong, W. Hua, N. Zhao, Preparation of MoS2/TiO2 based nanocomposites for photocatalysis and rechargeable batteries: progress, challenges, and perspective. Nanoscale 10(1), 34–68 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NR07366F
  19. X. Chen, L. Liu, P.Y. Yu, S.S. Mao, Increasing solar absorption for photocatalysis with black hydrogenated titanium dioxide nanocrystals. Science 331(6018), 746–750 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200448
  20. S.U.M. Khan, M. Al-Shahry, W.B. Ingler, Efficient photochemical water splitting by a chemically modified n-TiO2. Science 297(5590), 2243–2245 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1075035
  21. M. Ge, Q. Li, C. Cao, J. Huang, S. Li et al., One-dimensional TiO2 nanotube photocatalysts for solar water splitting. Adv. Sci. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201600152
  22. Y. Song, N. Li, D. Chen, Q. Xu, H. Li, J. He, J. Lu, 3D ordered mop inverse opals deposited with CdS quantum dots for enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 238, 255–262 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.07.010
  23. Q. Li, B. Guo, J. Yu, J. Ran, B. Zhang, H. Yan, J.R. Gong, Highly efficient visible-light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen production of CdS-cluster-decorated graphene nanosheets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133(28), 10878–10884 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja2025454
  24. X. Zong, H. Yan, G. Wu, G. Ma, F. Wen, L. Wang, C. Li, Enhancement of photocatalytic H2 evolution on CdS by loading MoS2 as cocatalyst under visible light irradiation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130(23), 7176–7177 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja8007825
  25. L. Jiang, X. Yuan, Y. Pan, J. Liang, G. Zeng, Z. Wu, H. Wang, Doping of graphitic carbon nitride for photocatalysis: a review. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 217, 388–406 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.06.003
  26. G. Zhang, Z.-A. Lan, X. Wang, Surface engineering of graphitic carbon nitride polymers with cocatalysts for photocatalytic overall water splitting. Chem. Sci. 8(8), 5261–5274 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7SC01747B
  27. J. Fei, J. Li, Controlled preparation of porous TiO2–Ag nanostructures through supramolecular assembly for plasmon-enhanced photocatalysis. Adv. Mater. 27(2), 314–319 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201404007
  28. M.H. Sun, S.Z. Huang, L.H. Chen, Y. Li, X.Y. Yang, Z.Y. Yuan, B.L. Su, Applications of hierarchically structured porous materials from energy storage and conversion, catalysis, photocatalysis, adsorption, separation, and sensing to biomedicine. Chem. Soc. Rev. 45(12), 3479–3563 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CS00135A
  29. B. Lu, X. Li, T. Wang, E. Xie, Z. Xu, WO3 nanoparticles decorated on both sidewalls of highly porous TiO2 nanotubes to improve UV and visible-light photocatalysis. J. Mater. Chem. A 1(12), 3900–3906 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta01444d
  30. S. Wang, X. Wang, Multifunctional metal–organic frameworks for photocatalysis. Small 11(26), 3097–3112 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201500084
  31. B. Qiu, M. Xing, J. Zhang, Mesoporous TiO2 nanocrystals grown in situ on graphene aerogels for high photocatalysis and lithium-ion batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136(16), 5852–5855 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja500873u
  32. J. Yu, Y. Su, B. Cheng, Template-free fabrication and enhanced photocatalytic activity of hierarchical macro-/mesoporous titania. Adv. Funct. Mater. 17(12), 1984–1990 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200600933
  33. Q. Liang, Z. Li, X. Yu, Z.H. Huang, F. Kang, Q.H. Yang, Macroscopic 3D porous graphitic carbon nitride monolith for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Adv. Mater. 27(31), 4634–4639 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201502057
  34. C. Chen, W. Cai, M. Long, B. Zhou, Y. Wu, D. Wu, Y. Feng, Synthesis of visible-light responsive graphene oxide/TiO2 composites with p/n heterojunction. ACS Nano 4(11), 6425–6432 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn102130m
  35. H. Wang, L. Zhang, Z. Chen, J. Hu, S. Li, Z. Wang, J. Liu, X. Wang, Semiconductor heterojunction photocatalysts: design, construction, and photocatalytic performances. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43(15), 5234–5244 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CS00126E
  36. Y. Bessekhouad, D. Robert, J.V. Weber, Photocatalytic activity of Cu2O/TiO2, Bi2O3/TiO2 and ZnMn2O4/TiO2 heterojunctions. Catal. Today 101(3–4), 315–321 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2005.03.038
  37. F. Dong, Z. Zhao, T. Xiong, Z. Ni, W. Zhang, Y. Sun, W.K. Ho, In situ construction of g-C3N4/g-C3N4 metal-free heterojunction for enhanced visible-light photocatalysis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 5(21), 11392–11401 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/am403653a
  38. D. Lin, H. Wu, R. Zhang, W. Pan, Enhanced photocatalysis of electrospun Ag-ZnO heterostructured nanofibers. Chem. Mater. 21(15), 3479–3484 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/cm900225p
  39. J. Low, J. Yu, M. Jaroniec, S. Wageh, A.A. Al-Ghamdi, Heterojunction photocatalysts. Adv. Mater. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201601694
  40. Z. Zhang, C. Shao, X. Li, C. Wang, M. Zhang, Y. Liu, Electrospun nanofibers of p-type NiO/n-type ZnO heterojunctions with enhanced photocatalytic activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2(10), 2915–2923 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/am100618h
  41. D. Sarkar, C.K. Ghosh, S. Mukherjee, K.K. Chattopadhyay, Three dimensional Ag2O/TiO2 type-II (p–n) nanoheterojunctions for superior photocatalytic activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 5(2), 331–337 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/am302136y
  42. Y. Cho, S. Kim, B. Park, C.L. Lee, J.K. Kim et al., Multiple heterojunction in single titanium dioxide nanoparticles for novel metal-free photocatalysis. Nano Lett. 18(7), 4257–4262 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b01245
  43. A. Schneemann, V. Bon, I. Schwedler, I. Senkovska, S. Kaskel, R.A. Fischer, Flexible metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43(16), 6062–6096 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CS00101J
  44. M.R. Lohe, K. Gedrich, T. Freudenberg, E. Kockrick, T. Dellmann, S. Kaskel, Heating and separation using nanomagnet-functionalized metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Commun. 47(11), 3075–3077 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cc05278g
  45. X. Zhu, H. Zheng, X. Wei, Z. Lin, L. Guo, B. Qiu, G. Chen, Metal–organic framework (MOF): a novel sensing platform for biomolecules. Chem. Commun. 49(13), 1276–1278 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cc36661d
  46. S. Li, F. Huo, Metal–organic framework composites: from fundamentals to applications. Nanoscale 7(17), 7482–7501 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR00518C
  47. L.E. Kreno, K. Leong, O.K. Farha, M. Allendorf, R.P. Van Duyne, J.T. Hupp, Metal-organic framework materials as chemical sensors. Chem. Rev. 112(2), 1105–1125 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200324t
  48. H. Furukawa, N. Ko, Y.B. Go, N. Aratani, S.B. Choi et al., Ultrahigh porosity in metal–organic frameworks. Science 329(5990), 424–428 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1192160
  49. G. Maurin, C. Serre, A. Cooper, G. Férey, The new age of MOFs and of their porous-related solids. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46(11), 3104–3107 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CS90049J
  50. Y. Li, H. Xu, S. Ouyang, J. Ye, Metal–organic frameworks for photocatalysis. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18(11), 7563–7572 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP05885F
  51. S. Subudhi, D. Rath, K.M. Parida, A mechanistic approach towards the photocatalytic organic transformations over functionalised metal organic frameworks: a review. Catal. Sci. Technol. 8(3), 679–696 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CY02094E
  52. A. Dhakshinamoorthy, Z. Li, H. Garcia, Catalysis and photocatalysis by metal organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47(22), 8134–8172 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CS00256H
  53. Z. Wu, X. Yuan, J. Zhang, H. Wang, L. Jiang, G. Zeng, Photocatalytic decontamination of wastewater containing organic dyes by metal–organic frameworks and their derivatives. ChemCatChem 9(1), 41–64 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201600808
  54. H.L. Jiang, B. Liu, Y.Q. Lan, K. Kuratani, T. Akita, H. Shioyama, F.Q. Zong, Q. Xu, From metal–organic framework to nanoporous carbon: toward a very high surface area and hydrogen uptake. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133(31), 11854–11857 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja203184k
  55. X. Ma, Y.X. Zhou, H. Liu, Y. Li, H.L. Jiang, A MOF-derived Co-CoO@N-doped porous carbon for efficient tandem catalysis: dehydrogenation of ammonia borane and hydrogenation of nitro compounds. Chem. Commun. 52(49), 7719–7722 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CC03149H
  56. B. Ma, P.Y. Guan, Q.Y. Li, M. Zhang, S.Q. Zang, MOF-derived flower-like MoS2@TiO2 nanohybrids with enhanced activity for hydrogen evolution. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 8(40), 26794–26800 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b08740
  57. X. Han, W.M. Chen, X. Han, Y.Z. Tan, D. Sun, Nitrogen-rich MOF derived porous Co3O4/N-C composites with superior performance in lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 4(34), 13040–13045 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA05096D
  58. X. Zhao, H. Yang, P. Jing, W. Shi, G. Yang, P. Cheng, A metal–organic framework approach toward highly nitrogen-doped graphitic carbon as a metal-free photocatalyst for hydrogen evolution. Small 13(9), 1603279 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201603279
  59. L. Zhang, H.B. Wu, X.W. Lou, Metal–organic-frameworks-derived general formation of hollow structures with high complexity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135(29), 10664–10672 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja401727n
  60. W. Xia, A. Mahmood, R. Zou, Q. Xu, Metal–organic frameworks and their derived nanostructures for electrochemical energy storage and conversion. Energy Environ. Sci. 8(7), 1837–1866 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EE00762C
  61. Y. Du, R.Z. Chen, J.F. Yao, H.T. Wang, Facile fabrication of porous ZnO by thermal treatment of zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 and its photocatalytic activity. J. Alloys Compd. 551, 125–130 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.10.045
  62. L. Pan, T. Muhammad, L. Ma, Z.F. Huang, S. Wang, L. Wang, J.J. Zou, X. Zhang, MOF-derived C-doped ZnO prepared via a two-step calcination for efficient photocatalysis. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 189, 181–191 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.02.066
  63. X. Han, X. He, F. Wang, J. Chen, J. Xu, X. Wang, X. Han, Engineering an N-doped Cu2O@N–C interface with long-lived photo-generated carriers for efficient photoredox catalysts. J. Mater. Chem. A 5(21), 10220–10226 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA01909B
  64. J. Chen, J. Yu, J. Zhang, Enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction activity of MOF-derived ZnO/NiO porous hollow spheres. J. CO2 Util. 24, 548–554 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2018.02.013
  65. M. Lan, R.M. Guo, Y. Dou, J. Zhou, A. Zhou, J.R. Li, Fabrication of porous Pt-doping heterojunctions by using bimetallic MOF template for photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Nano Energy 33, 238–246 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.046
  66. K.E. deKrafft, C. Wang, W. Lin, Metal–organic framework templated synthesis of Fe2O3/TiO2 nanocomposite for hydrogen production. Adv. Mater. 24(15), 2014–2018 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201200330
  67. L. He, L. Li, T. Wang, H. Gao, G. Li, X. Wu, Z. Su, C. Wang, Fabrication of Au/ZnO nanoparticles derived from ZIF-8 with visible light photocatalytic hydrogen production and degradation dye activities. Dalton Trans. 43(45), 16981–16985 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4DT02557A
  68. Y. Zhang, J. Huang, Y. Ding, Porous Co3O4/CuO hollow polyhedral nanocages derived from metal–organic frameworks with heterojunctions as efficient photocatalytic water oxidation catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 198, 447–456 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.05.078
  69. Y. Su, D. Ao, H. Liu, Y. Wang, MOF-derived yolk–shell CdS microcubes with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity and stability for hydrogen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 5(18), 8680–8689 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA00855D
  70. D.P. Kumar, H. Park, E.H. Kim, S. Hong, M. Gopannagari, D.A. Reddy, T.K. Kim, Noble metal-free metal–organic framework-derived onion slice-type hollow cobalt sulfide nanostructures: enhanced activity of CdS for improving photocatalytic hydrogen production. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 224, 230–238 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.10.051
  71. Z.F. Huang, J. Song, K. Li, M. Tahir, Y.T. Wang, L. Pan, L. Wang, X. Zhang, J.J. Zou, Hollow cobalt-based bimetallic sulfide polyhedra for efficient all-pH-value electrochemical and photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138(4), 1359–1365 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b11986
  72. X. Zhao, J. Feng, J. Liu, W. Shi, G. Yang, G.C. Wang, P. Cheng, An efficient, visible-light-driven, hydrogen evolution catalyst NiS/ZnxCd1-xS nanocrystal derived from a metal–organic framework. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57(31), 9790–9794 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201805425
  73. W. Chen, J. Fang, Y. Zhang, G. Chen, S. Zhao et al., CdS nanosphere-decorated hollow polyhedral ZCO derived from a metal–organic framework (MOF) for effective photocatalytic water evolution. Nanoscale 10(9), 4463–4474 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NR08943K
  74. S. Wang, B.Y. Guan, Y. Lu, X.W.D. Lou, Formation of hierarchical In2S3–CdIn2S4 heterostructured nanotubes for efficient and stable visible light CO2 reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139(48), 17305–17308 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b10733
  75. K. Meyer, M. Ranocchiari, J.A. van Bokhoven, Metal organic frameworks for photo-catalytic water splitting. Energy Environ. Sci. 8(7), 1923–1937 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EE00161G
  76. W. Wang, X. Xu, W. Zhou, Z. Shao, Recent progress in metal–organic frameworks for applications in electrocatalytic and photocatalytic water splitting. Adv. Sci. 4(4), 1600371 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201600371
  77. Y.J. Yuan, D. Chen, Z.T. Yu, Z.G. Zou, Cadmium sulfide-based nanomaterials for photocatalytic hydrogen production. J. Mater. Chem. A 6(25), 11606–11630 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA00671G
  78. X. Chen, S.S. Mao, Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: synthesis, properties, modifications, and applications. Chem. Rev. 107(7), 2891–2959 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0500535
  79. B. O’Regan, M. Grätzel, A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 353, 737–740 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/353737a0
  80. S. Bala, I. Mondal, A. Goswami, U. Pal, R. Mondal, Synthesis, crystal structure and optical properties of a naphthylbisimide-Ni complex: a framework on TiO2 for visible light H2 production. Dalton Trans. 43(42), 15704–15707 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4DT02006E
  81. R. Li, S. Wu, X. Wan, H. Xu, Y. Xiong, Cu/TiO2 octahedral-shell photocatalysts derived from metal–organic framework@semiconductor hybrid structures. Inorg. Chem. Front. 3(1), 104–110 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5QI00205B
  82. P. Minh-Hao, D. Cao-Thang, V. Gia-Thanh, T. Ngoc-Don, D. Trong-On, Visible light induced hydrogen generation using a hollow photocatalyst with two cocatalysts separated on two surface sides. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16(13), 5937–5941 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cp54629b
  83. B. Yan, L. Zhang, Z. Tang, M. Al-Mamun, H. Zhao, X. Su, Palladium-decorated hierarchical titania constructed from the metal–organic frameworks NH2-MIL-125(Ti) as a robust photocatalyst for hydrogen evolution. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 218, 743–750 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.07.020
  84. S. Bala, I. Mondal, A. Goswami, U. Pal, R. Mondal, Co–MOF as a sacrificial template: manifesting a new Co3O4/TiO2 system with a p–n heterojunction for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 3(40), 20288–20296 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA05210F
  85. J. Yao, J. Chen, K. Shen, Y. Li, Phase-controllable synthesis of MOF-templated maghemite–carbonaceous composites for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production. J. Mater. Chem. A 6(8), 3571–3582 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA10284D
  86. R. Li, L. Sun, W. Zhan, Y.A. Li, X. Wang, X. Han, Engineering an effective noble-metal-free photocatalyst for hydrogen evolution: hollow hexagonal porous micro-rods assembled from In2O3@carbon core–shell nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. A 6(32), 15747–15754 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA04916E
  87. J.Y. Xu, X.P. Zhai, L.F. Gao, P. Chen, M. Zhao, H.B. Yang, D.F. Cao, Q. Wang, H.L. Zhang, In situ preparation of a MOF-derived magnetic carbonaceous catalyst for visible-light-driven hydrogen evolution. RSC Adv. 6(3), 2011–2018 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA23838B
  88. J.D. Xiao, H.L. Jiang, Thermally stable metal–organic framework-templated synthesis of hierarchically porous metal sulfides: enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production. Small 13(28), 1700632 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201700632
  89. D.P. Kumar, J. Choi, S. Hong, D.A. Reddy, S. Lee, T.K. Kim, Rational synthesis of metal–organic framework-derived noble metal-free nickel phosphide nanoparticles as a highly efficient co-catalyst for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 4(12), 7158–7166 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02032
  90. X. Tang, J.H. Zhao, Y.H. Li, Z.J. Zhou, K. Li, F.T. Liu, Y.Q. Lan, Co-doped Zn1−xCdxS nanocrystals from metal–organic framework precursors: porous microstructure and efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Dalton Trans. 46(32), 10553–10557 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7DT01970J
  91. H. Chen, Z.G. Gu, S. Mirza, S.H. Zhang, J. Zhang, Hollow Cu–TiO2/C nanospheres derived from a Ti precursor encapsulated MOF coating for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 6(16), 7175–7181 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA01034J
  92. M. Zhang, Y.L. Huang, J.W. Wang, T.B. Lu, A facile method for the synthesis of a porous cobalt oxide-carbon hybrid as a highly efficient water oxidation catalyst. J. Mater. Chem. A 4(5), 1819–1827 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA07813J
  93. Q. Lan, Z.M. Zhang, C. Qin, X.L. Wang, Y.G. Li, H.Q. Tan, E.B. Wang, Highly dispersed polyoxometalate-doped porous Co3O4 water oxidation photocatalysts derived from POM@MOF crystalline materials. Chem. Eur. J. 22(43), 15513–15520 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201602127
  94. Y. Feng, J. Wei, Y. Ding, Efficient photochemical, thermal, and electrochemical water oxidation catalyzed by a porous iron-based oxide derived metal organic framework. J. Phys. Chem. C 120(1), 517–526 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b11533
  95. J. Wei, Y. Feng, Y. Liu, Y. Ding, MxCo3−xO4 (M = Co, Mn, Fe) porous nanocages derived from metal–organic frameworks as efficient water oxidation catalysts. J. Mater. Chem. A 3(44), 22300–22310 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA06411B
  96. P. Liang, C. Zhang, H. Sun, S. Liu, M. Tade, S. Wang, Photocatalysis of C,N-doped ZnO derived from ZIF-8 for dye degradation and water oxidation. RSC Adv. 6(98), 95903–95909 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA20667K
  97. B. Li, F. Li, S. Bai, Z. Wang, L. Sun, Q. Yang, C. Li, Oxygen evolution from water oxidation on molecular catalysts confined in the nanocages of mesoporous silicas. Energy Environ. Sci. 5(8), 8229–8233 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ee22059h
  98. M. Yagi, M. Kaneko, Molecular catalysts for water oxidation. Chem. Rev. 101(1), 21–36 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr980108l
  99. F. Jiao, H. Frei, Nanostructured cobalt and manganese oxide clusters as efficient water oxidation catalysts. Energy Environ. Sci. 3(8), 1018–1027 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1039/c002074e
  100. D. Hong, Y. Yamada, T. Nagatomi, Y. Takai, S. Fukuzumi, Catalysis of nickel ferrite for photocatalytic water oxidation using [Ru(bpy)3]2+ and S2O8 2−. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134(48), 19572–19575 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja309771h
  101. J. Huang, G. Hu, Y. Ding, M. Pang, B. Ma, Mn-doping and NiFe layered double hydroxide coating: effective approaches to enhancing the performance of α-Fe2O3 in photoelectrochemical water oxidation. J. Catal. 340, 261–269 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2016.05.007
  102. D.M. Robinson, Y.B. Go, M. Mui, G. Gardner, Z. Zhang et al., Photochemical water oxidation by crystalline polymorphs of manganese oxides: structural requirements for catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135(9), 3494–3501 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja310286h
  103. F. Lu, M. Zhou, Y. Zhou, X. Zeng, First-row transition metal based catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction under alkaline conditions: basic principles and recent advances. Small 13(45), 1701931 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201701931
  104. M. Zhou, Q. Weng, Z.I. Popov, Y. Yang, L.Y. Antipina, P.B. Sorokin, X. Wang, Y. Bando, D. Golberg, Construction of polarized carbon–nickel catalytic surfaces for potent, durable, and economic hydrogen evolution reactions. ACS Nano 12(5), 4148–4155 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b08724
  105. M. Zhou, Q. Weng, X. Zhang, X. Wang, Y. Xue, X. Zeng, Y. Bando, D. Golberg, In situ electrochemical formation of core–shell nickel–iron disulfide and oxyhydroxide heterostructured catalysts for a stable oxygen evolution reaction and the associated mechanisms. J. Mater. Chem. A 5(9), 4335–4342 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA09366C
  106. X. Lu, C. Zhao, Electrodeposition of hierarchically structured three-dimensional nickel–iron electrodes for efficient oxygen evolution at high current densities. Nat. Commun. 6, 6616 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7616
  107. R. Li, W. Zhang, K. Zhou, Metal–organic-framework-based catalysts for photoreduction of CO2. Adv. Mater. 30(35), 1705512 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201705512
  108. H. Zhang, T. Wang, J. Wang, H. Liu, T.D. Dao et al., Surface-plasmon-enhanced photodriven CO2 reduction catalyzed by metal–organic-framework-derived iron nanoparticles encapsulated by ultrathin carbon layers. Adv. Mater. 28(19), 3703–3710 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201505187
  109. C.Y. Hu, J. Zhou, C.Y. Sun, M.M. Chen, X.L. Wang, Z.M. Su, HKUST-1 derived hollow C–Cu2−xS nanotube/g-C3N4 composites for visible-light CO2 photoreduction with H2O vapor. Chemistry 24, 1–8 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201804925
  110. K. Khaletskaya, A. Pougin, R. Medishetty, C. Rosler, C. Wiktor, J. Strunk, R.A. Fischer, Fabrication of gold/titania photocatalyst for CO2 reduction based on pyrolytic conversion of the metal–organic framework NH2-MIL-125(Ti) loaded with gold nanoparticles. Chem. Mater. 27(21), 7248–7257 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03017
  111. S. Yan, Y. Yu, Y. Cao, Synthesis of porous ZnMn2O4 flower-like microspheres by using MOF as precursors and its application on photoreduction of CO2 into CO. Appl. Surf. Sci. 465, 383–388 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.211
  112. J.M.R. Narayanam, C.R.J. Stephenson, Visible light photoredox catalysis: applications in organic synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40(1), 102–113 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/B913880N
  113. F. Wang, X. He, L. Sun, J. Chen, X. Wang, J. Xu, X. Han, Engineering an N-doped TiO2@N-doped C butterfly-like nanostructure with long-lived photo-generated carriers for efficient photocatalytic selective amine oxidation. J. Mater. Chem. A 6(5), 2091–2099 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA09166D
  114. X. Han, X. He, L. Sun, X. Han, W. Zhan, J. Xu, X. Wang, J. Chen, Increasing effectiveness of photogenerated carriers by in situ anchoring of Cu2O nanoparticles on a nitrogen-doped porous carbon yolk–shell cuboctahedral framework. ACS Catal. 8(4), 3348–3356 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b04219
  115. A. Ahmed, M. Forster, J. Jin, P. Myers, H. Zhang, Tuning morphology of nanostructured ZIF-8 on silica microspheres and applications in liquid chromatography and dye degradation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 7(32), 18054–18063 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b04979
  116. J. Li, X. Xu, X. Liu, W. Qin, M. Wang, L. Pan, Metal-organic frameworks derived cake-like anatase/rutile mixed phase TiO2 for highly efficient photocatalysis. J. Alloys Compd. 690, 640–646 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.08.176
  117. Z. Guo, J.K. Cheng, Z. Hu, M. Zhang, Q. Xu, Z. Kang, D. Zhao, Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) as precursors towards TiOx/C composites for photodegradation of organic dye. RSC Adv. 4(65), 34221–34225 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA05429F
  118. Q. Xu, Z. Guo, M. Zhang, Z. Hu, Y. Qian, D. Zhao, Highly efficient photocatalysts by pyrolyzing a Zn–Ti heterometallic metal–organic framework. CrystEngComm 18(22), 4046–4052 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CE01439E
  119. H. Chen, K. Shen, J. Chen, X. Chen, Y. Li, Hollow–ZIF-templated formation of a ZnO@C–N–Co core–shell nanostructure for highly efficient pollutant photodegradation. J. Mater. Chem. A 5(20), 9937–9945 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA02184D
  120. Y. Feng, H. Lu, X. Gu, J. Qiu, M. Jia, C. Huang, J. Yao, ZIF-8 derived porous N-doped ZnO with enhanced visible light-driven photocatalytic activity. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 102, 110–114 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2016.11.022
  121. X. Cao, B. Zheng, X. Rui, W. Shi, Q. Yan, H. Zhang, Metal oxide-coated three-dimensional graphene prepared by the use of metal–organic frameworks as precursors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 126(5), 1428–1433 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201308013
  122. G. Zhu, X. Li, H. Wang, L. Zhang, Microwave assisted synthesis of reduced graphene oxide incorporated MOF-derived ZnO composites for photocatalytic application. Catal. Commun. 88, 5–8 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2016.09.024
  123. N. Salehifar, Z. Zarghami, M. Ramezani, A facile, novel and low-temperature synthesis of MgO nanorods via thermal decomposition using new starting reagent and its photocatalytic activity evaluation. Mater. Lett. 167, 226–229 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2016.01.015
  124. Q.X. Zeng, G.C. Xu, L. Zhang, H. Lin, Y. Lv, D.Z. Jia, Porous CuO nanofibers derived from a Cu-based coordination polymer as a photocatalyst for the degradation of rhodamine B. New J. Chem. 42(9), 7016–7024 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NJ00608C
  125. H.M. Aly, M.E. Moustafa, M.Y. Nassar, E.A. Abdelrahman, Synthesis and characterization of novel Cu(II) complexes with 3-substituted-4-amino-5-mercapto-1,2,4-triazole Schiff bases: a new route to CuO nanoparticles. J. Mol. Struct. 1086, 223–231 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2015.01.017
  126. P. Mahata, T. Aarthi, G. Madras, S. Natarajan, Photocatalytic degradation of dyes and organics with nanosized GdCoO3. J. Phys. Chem. C 111(4), 1665–1674 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp066302q
  127. J. Xu, J. Gao, Y. Liu, Q. Li, L. Wang, Fabrication of In2O3/Co3O4-palygorskite composites by the pyrolysis of In/Co–MOFs for efficient degradation of methylene blue and tetracycline. Mater. Res. Bull. 91, 1–8 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2017.03.018
  128. Y. Lin, H. Wan, F. Chen, X. Liu, R. Ma, T. Sasaki, Two-dimensional porous cuprous oxide nanoplatelets derived from metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) for efficient photocatalytic dye degradation under visible light. Dalton Trans. 47(23), 7694–7700 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8DT01117F
  129. C. Zhang, F. Ye, S. Shen, Y. Xiong, L. Su, S. Zhao, From metal–organic frameworks to magnetic nanostructured porous carbon composites: towards highly efficient dye removal and degradation. RSC Adv. 5(11), 8228–8235 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA15942J
  130. K.Y. Andrew Lin, F.K. Hsu, W.D. Lee, Magnetic cobalt–graphene nanocomposite derived from self-assembly of MOFs with graphene oxide as an activator for peroxymonosulfate. J. Mater. Chem. A 3(18), 9480–9490 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA06516F
  131. Y.F. Zhang, L.G. Qiu, Y.P. Yuan, Y.J. Zhu, X. Jiang, J.D. Xiao, Magnetic Fe3O4@C/Cu and Fe3O4@CuO core–shell composites constructed from MOF-based materials and their photocatalytic properties under visible light. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 144, 863–869 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.08.019
  132. Z.X. Li, B.L. Yang, Y.F. Jiang, C.Y. Yu, L. Zhang, Metal-directed assembly of five 4-connected MOFs: one-pot syntheses of MOF-derived MxSy@C composites for photocatalytic degradation and supercapacitors. Cryst. Growth Des. 18(2), 979–992 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.7b01463
  133. S.K. Batabyal, S.E. Lu, J.J. Vittal, Synthesis, characterization, and photocatalytic properties of In2S3, ZnIn2S4, and CdIn2S4 nanocrystals. Cryst. Growth Des. 16(4), 2231–2238 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.6b00050
  134. X. Yang, J. Chen, J. Hu, S. Zhao, J. Zhao, X. Luo, Metal organic framework-derived Zn1−xCox–ZIF@Zn1−xCoxO hybrid photocatalyst with enhanced photocatalytic activity through synergistic effect. Catal. Sci. Technol. 8(2), 573–579 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CY01979C
  135. Y. Gong, X. Zhao, H. Zhang, B. Yang, K. Xiao et al., MOF-derived nitrogen doped carbon modified g-C3N4 heterostructure composite with enhanced photocatalytic activity for bisphenol a degradation with peroxymonosulfate under visible light irradiation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 233, 35–45 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.03.077
  136. Y. Jing, J. Wang, B. Yu, J. Lun, Y. Cheng et al., A MOF-derived ZIF-8@Zn1−xNixO photocatalyst with enhanced photocatalytic activity. RSC Adv. 7(67), 42030–42035 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA08763B
  137. C. Yang, J. Cheng, Y. Chen, Y. Hu, CdS nanoparticles immobilized on porous carbon polyhedrons derived from a metal–organic framework with enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity for antibiotic degradation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 420, 252–259 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.05.102
  138. B. Hu, J.Y. Yuan, J.Y. Tian, M. Wang, X. Wang, L. He, Z. Zhang, Z.W. Wang, C.S. Liu, Co/Fe-bimetallic organic framework-derived carbon-incorporated cobalt–ferric mixed metal phosphide as a highly efficient photocatalyst under visible light. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 531, 148–159 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.07.037
  139. S.J. Yang, J.H. Im, T. Kim, K. Lee, C.R. Park, MOF-derived ZnO and ZnO@C composites with high photocatalytic activity and adsorption capacity. J. Hazard. Mater. 186(1), 376–382 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.019
Read More
Author biographies are not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 7103 Download : 5385

Most read articles by the same author(s)