Issue

Vol. 16 (2024)

Rational Design of Cost-Effective Metal-Doped ZrO2 for Oxygen Evolution Reaction

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-024-01403-7
Yuefeng Zhang
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, and State Key Laboratory of Marine Pollution, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China
Tianyi Wang
Advanced Institute for Materials Research (WPI‑AIMR), Tohoku University, Sendai 980‑8577, Japan
Liang Mei
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, and State Key Laboratory of Marine Pollution, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China
Ruijie Yang
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, and State Key Laboratory of Marine Pollution, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China
Weiwei Guo
Shanxi Supercomputing Center, Lvliang 033000, Shanxi, People’s Republic of China
Hao Li
Advanced Institute for Materials Research (WPI‑AIMR), Tohoku University, Sendai 980‑8577, Japan

Corresponding Author: Hao Li

li.hao.b8@tohoku.ac.jp

Nano-Micro Letters, Vol. 16 (2024), Article Number: 180

Abstract

The design of cost-effective electrocatalysts is an open challenging for oxygen evolution reaction (OER) due to the “stable-or-active” dilemma. Zirconium dioxide (ZrO2), a versatile and low-cost material that can be stable under OER operating conditions, exhibits inherently poor OER activity from experimental observations. Herein, we doped a series of metal elements to regulate the ZrO2 catalytic activity in OER via spin-polarized density functional theory calculations with van der Waals interactions. Microkinetic modeling as a function of the OER activity descriptor (GO*-GHO*) displays that 16 metal dopants enable to enhance OER activities over a thermodynamically stable ZrO2 surface, among which Fe and Rh (in the form of single-atom dopant) reach the volcano peak (i.e. the optimal activity of OER under the potential of interest), indicating excellent OER performance. Free energy diagram calculations, density of states, and ab initio molecular dynamics simulations further showed that Fe and Rh are the effective dopants for ZrO2, leading to low OER overpotential, high conductivity, and good stability. Considering cost-effectiveness, single-atom Fe doped ZrO2 emerged as the most promising catalyst for OER. This finding offers a valuable perspective and reference for experimental researchers to design cost-effective catalysts for the industrial-scale OER production.


Highlights:
1 Surface energy and surface Pourbaix diagram reveal that ZrO2 (111) is the most thermodynamically stable facet and is preferentially occupied by HO* at the equilibrium potential of oxygen evolution reaction (OER).
2 Microkinetic modeling analyzed the OER activity of 40 single-metal doped ZrO2 and identified 16 metals exhibit improved catalytic activity, with Rh and Fe dopants showing the remarkable improvement.
3 Thermodynamic free energy diagrams, density of states analysis, and ab initio molecular dynamics simulations further confirm that Fe–ZrO2 and Rh–ZrO2 are highly promising catalysts for OER, showcasing low ΔG for the rate-determining step, high conductivity, and exceptional stability.

Keywords

Oxygen evolution reaction Metal oxide Electrocatalysis Surface Pourbaix analysis Doping
Zhang, Yuefeng, Tianyi Wang, Liang Mei, Ruijie Yang, Weiwei Guo, and Hao Li. 2024. “Rational Design of Cost-Effective Metal-Doped ZrO2 for Oxygen Evolution Reaction”. Nano-Micro Letters 16 (April):180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-024-01403-7.
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. J. Li, Oxygen evolution reaction in energy conversion and storage: design strategies under and beyond the energy scaling relationship. Nano-Micro Lett. 14, 112 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00857-x
  2. Z.W. Seh, J. Kibsgaard, C.F. Dickens, I. Chorkendorff, J.K. Nørskov et al., Combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis: insights into materials design. Science 355, eaad4998 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad4998
  3. L. Mei, X. Gao, Z. Gao, Q. Zhang, X. Yu et al., Size-selective synthesis of platinum nanops on transition-metal dichalcogenides for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Chem. Commun. 57, 2879–2882 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cc08091h
  4. M.G. Walter, E.L. Warren, J.R. McKone, S.W. Boettcher, Q. Mi et al., Solar water splitting cells. Chem. Rev. 110, 6446–6473 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr1002326
  5. B. Guo, Y. Ding, H. Huo, X. Wen, X. Ren et al., Recent advances of transition metal basic salts for electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction and overall water electrolysis. Nano-Micro Lett. 15, 57 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01038-0
  6. J. Li, J. Li, J. Ren, H. Hong, D. Liu et al., Electric-field-treated Ni/Co3O4 film as high-performance bifunctional electrocatalysts for efficient overall water splitting. Nano-Micro Lett. 14, 148 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00889-3
  7. P. Wang, Y. Luo, G. Zhang, Z. Chen, H. Ranganathan et al., Interface engineering of NixSy@MnOxHy nanorods to efficiently enhance overall-water-splitting activity and stability. Nano-Micro Lett. 14, 120 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00860-2
  8. T.R. Cook, D.K. Dogutan, S.Y. Reece, Y. Surendranath, T.S. Teets et al., Solar energy supply and storage for the legacy and nonlegacy worlds. Chem. Rev. 110, 6474–6502 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr100246c
  9. I.C. Man, H.-Y. Su, F. Calle-Vallejo, H.A. Hansen, J.I. Martínez et al., Universality in oxygen evolution electrocatalysis on oxide surfaces. ChemCatChem 3, 1159–1165 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201000397
  10. E. Antolini, Iridium as catalyst and cocatalyst for oxygen evolution/reduction in acidic polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyzers and fuel cells. ACS Catal. 4, 1426–1440 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/cs4011875
  11. M.D. Symes, L. Cronin, Decoupling hydrogen and oxygen evolution during electrolytic water splitting using an electron-coupled-proton buffer. Nat. Chem. 5, 403–409 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1621
  12. J. Liu, Y. He, L. Yan, C. Ma, C. Zhang et al., Nano-ZrO2 as hydrogenation phase in bi-functional catalyst for syngas aromatization. Fuel 263, 116803 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116803
  13. T. Yamaguchi, Application of ZrO2 as a catalyst and a catalyst support. Catal. Today 20, 199–217 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-5861(94)80003-0
  14. F.F. Alharbi, M.U. Nisa, H.M.A. Hassan, S. Manzoor, Z. Ahmad et al., Novel lanthanum sulfide–decorated zirconia nanohybrid for enhanced electrochemical oxygen evolution reaction. J. Solid State Electrochem. 26, 2171–2182 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-022-05220-z
  15. S.B. Jaffri, K.S. Ahmad, I. Abrahams, C.J. Kousseff, C.B. Nielsen et al., Rare earth (Sm/Eu/Tm) doped ZrO2 driven electro-catalysis, energy storage, and scaffolding in high-performance perovskite solar cells. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 48, 29119–29141 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.04.085
  16. M. Sadaqat, S. Manzoor, S. Aman, L. Nisar, M. Najam-Ul-Haq et al., Defective nickel zirconium oxide mesoporous bifunctional electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution reaction and overall water splitting. Fuel 333, 126538 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126538
  17. Y. Zhang, J. Liu, Z. Wei, Q. Liu, C. Wang et al., Electrochemical CO2 reduction over nitrogen-doped SnO2 crystal surfaces. J. Energy Chem. 33, 22–30 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2018.08.017
  18. R.Q. Huang, W.P. Liao, M.X. Yan, S. Liu, Y.M. Li et al., P doped Ru-Pt alloy catalyst toward high performance alkaline hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Electrochem. 29, 2203081 (2023). https://jelectrochem.xmu.edu.cn/journal/vol29/iss5/3
  19. J. Lin, Y. Yan, C. Li, X. Si, H. Wang et al., Bifunctional electrocatalysts based on Mo-doped NiCoP nanosheet arrays for overall water splitting. Nano-Micro Lett. 11, 55 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-019-0289-6
  20. Y. Zhang, W. Zhang, Y. Feng, J. Ma, Promoted CO2 electroreduction over indium-doped SnP3: a computational study. J. Energy Chem. 48, 1–6 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2019.12.025
  21. Z. X. Wan, C. H. Wang, X. W. Kang, Self-supported Ru-Cu3P catalyst towards alkaline hydrogen evolution. J. Electrochem. 28, 2214005 (2022). https://jelectrochem.xmu.edu.cn/journal/vol28/iss10/6
  22. A.K. Mishra, D. Pradhan, Hierarchical urchin-like cobalt-doped CuO for enhanced electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 4, 9412–9419 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.1c01632
  23. M. Li, X. Wang, K. Liu, H. Sun, D. Sun et al., Reinforcing Co-O covalency via Ce(4f)─O(2p)─Co(3d) gradient orbital coupling for high-efficiency oxygen evolution. Adv. Mater. 35, 2302462 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202302462
  24. G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0
  25. G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes forab initiototal-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.54.11169
  26. B. Hammer, L.B. Hansen, J.K. Nørskov, Improved adsorption energetics within density-functional theory using revised Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof functionals. Phys. Rev. B 59, 7413–7421 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.59.7413
  27. L. Wang, T. Maxisch, G. Ceder, Oxidation energies of transition metal oxides within the GGA+U framework. Phys. Rev. B 73, 195107 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.73.195107
  28. D. Mutter, D.F. Urban, C. Elsässer, Determination of formation energies and phase diagrams of transition metal oxides with DFT+U. Materials 13, 4303 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13194303
  29. K. Jiang, S. Zhou, Z. Wang, Textured electronic states of the triangular-lattice Hubbard model and NaxCoO2. Phys. Rev. B 90, 165135 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.90.165135
  30. A. Cadi-Essadek, A. Roldan, D. Santos-Carballal, P.E. Ngoepe, M. Claeys et al., DFT+U study of the electronic, magnetic and mechanical properties of Co, CoO, and Co3O4. S. Afr. J. Chem. 74, 8–16 (2021). https://doi.org/10.17159/0379-4350/2021/v74a3
  31. X. Shi, S.L. Bernasek, A. Selloni, Formation, electronic structure, and defects of Ni substituted spinel cobalt oxide: a DFT+U study. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 14892–14898 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03096
  32. A. Jain, G. Hautier, S.P. Ong, C.J. Moore, C.C. Fischer et al., Formation enthalpies by mixing GGA and GGA+U calculations. Phys. Rev. B 84, 045115 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.84.045115
  33. G. Kresse, D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.59.1758
  34. E.H. Kisi, C.J. Howard, Crystal structures of zirconia phases and their inter-relation. Key Eng. Mater. 153–154, 1–36 (1998). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.153-154.1
  35. V.G. Keramidas, W.B. White, Raman scattering study of the crystallization and phase transformations of ZrO2. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 57, 22–24 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1974.tb11355.x
  36. D.K. Smith, W. Newkirk, The crystal structure of baddeleyite (monoclinic ZrO2) and its relation to the polymorphism of ZrO2. Acta Crystallogr. 18, 983–991 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1107/s0365110x65002402
  37. S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, H. Krieg, A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3382344
  38. H.J. Monkhorst, J.D. Pack, Special points for brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188
  39. S. Maintz, V.L. Deringer, A.L. Tchougréeff, R. Dronskowski, LOBSTER: a tool to extract chemical bonding from plane-wave based DFT. J. Comput. Chem. 37, 1030–1035 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.24300
  40. J.K. Nørskov, J. Rossmeisl, A. Logadottir, L. Lindqvist, J.R. Kitchin et al., Origin of the overpotential for oxygen reduction at a fuel-cell cathode. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 17886–17892 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp047349j
  41. M. Huang, C. Sun, X. Zhang, P. Wang, S. Xu et al., The surface structure, stability, and catalytic performances toward O2 reduction of CoP and FeCoP2. Dalton Trans. 51, 10420–10431 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2dt01408d
  42. Q. Li, M. Rellán-Piñeiro, N. Almora-Barrios, M. Garcia-Ratés, I.N. Remediakis et al., Shape control in concave metal nanops by etching. Nanoscale 9, 13089–13094 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/c7nr03889e
  43. C.F. Dickens, C. Kirk, J.K. Nørskov, Insights into the electrochemical oxygen evolution reaction with ab initio calculations and microkinetic modeling: beyond the limiting potential volcano. J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 18960–18977 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b03830
  44. H. Liu, X. Jia, A. Cao, L. Wei, C. D’agostino et al., The surface states of transition metal X-ides under electrocatalytic conditions. J. Chem. Phys. 158, 6 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0147123
  45. W. Yang, Z. Jia, B. Zhou, L. Wei, Z. Gao et al., Surface states of dual-atom catalysts should be considered for analysis of electrocatalytic activity. Commun. Chem. 6, 6 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-022-00810-4
  46. W. Yang, Z. Jia, L. Chen, B. Zhou, D. Zhang et al., Effects of intermetal distance on the electrochemistry-induced surface coverage of M-N-C dual-atom catalysts. Chem. Commun. 59, 10761–10764 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1039/d3cc03208f
  47. H. Liu, H. Zheng, Z. Jia, B. Zhou, Y. Liu et al., The CatMath: an online predictive platform for thermal + electrocatalysis. Front. Chem. Sci. Engin. 17, 2156–2160 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-023-2371-3
  48. G.-M. Rignanese, Dielectric properties of crystalline and amorphous transition metal oxides and silicates as potential high-κ candidates: the contribution of density-functional theory. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 17, R357–R379 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/17/7/r03
  49. A. Christensen, E.A. Carter, First-principles study of the surfaces of zirconia. Phys. Rev. B 58, 8050–8064 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.58.8050
  50. C. Morterra, G. Cerrato, L. Ferroni, L. Montanaro, Surface characterization of yttria-stabilized tetragonal ZrO2 Part 1. Structural, morphological, and surface hydration features. Mater. Chem. Phys. 37, 243–257 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0254-0584(94)90160-0
  51. L.G.V. Briquet, M. Sarwar, J. Mugo, G. Jones, F. Calle-Vallejo, A new type of scaling relations to assess the accuracy of computational predictions of catalytic activities applied to the oxygen evolution reaction. ChemCatChem 9, 1261–1268 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201601662
  52. H. Li, S. Kelly, D. Guevarra, Z. Wang, Y. Wang et al., Analysis of the limitations in the oxygen reduction activity of transition metal oxide surfaces. Nat. Catal. 4, 463–468 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-021-00618-w
  53. J. Rossmeisl, Z.-W. Qu, H. Zhu, G.-J. Kroes, J.K. Nørskov, Electrolysis of water on oxide surfaces. J. Electroanal. Chem. 607, 83–89 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2006.11.008
  54. K.S. Exner, J. Anton, T. Jacob, H. Over, Ligand effects and their impact on electrocatalytic processes exemplified with the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) on RuO2(110). ChemElectroChem 2, 707–713 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.201402430
  55. B. Zhang, X. Zheng, O. Voznyy, R. Comin, M. Bajdich et al., Homogeneously dispersed multimetal oxygen-evolving catalysts. Science 352, 333–337 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf1525
  56. W. Ahmed, J. Iqbal, S.O. Aisida, A. Badshah, I. Ahmad et al., Structural, magnetic and dielectric characteristics of optically tuned Fe doped ZrO2 nanops with visible light driven photocatalytic activity. Mater. Chem. Phys. 251, 122999 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.122999
  57. A.O. de Souza, F.F. Ivashita, V. Biondo, A. Paesano Jr., D.H. Mosca, Structural and magnetic properties of iron doped ZrO2. J. Alloys Compd. 680, 701–710 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.04.170
  58. P. Sakthisharmila, N. Sivakumar, J. Mathupriya, Synthesis, characterization of Mn, Fe doped ZrO2 composites and its applications on photocatalytic and solar catalytic studies. Mater. Today Proc. 47, 2159–2167 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.461
  59. X. Zhang, C. Sun, S. Xu, M. Huang, Y. Wen et al., DFT-assisted rational design of CoMxP/CC (M = Fe, Mn, and Ni) as efficient electrocatalyst for wide pH range hydrogen evolution and oxygen evolution. Nano Res. 15, 8897–8907 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-022-4771-y
  60. Y. Li, H. Zhang, M. Jiang, Q. Zhang, P. He, X. Sun, 3d self-supported Fe-doped Ni2P nanosheet arrays as bifunctional catalysts for overall water splitting. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 17025132017 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201702513
Read More
Author biographies are not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF SUPPLEMENTARY FILE
Statistic
Read Counter : 1872 Download : 1391