Issue

Vol. 15 (2023)

Additive-Driven Interfacial Engineering of Aluminum Metal Anode for Ultralong Cycling Life

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-01000-6
Sonal Kumar
Institute of Materials Research and Engineering, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 2 Fusionopolis Way, Innovis, Singapore 138634, Singapore
Prasad Rama
Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, 41125 Gothenburg, Sweden
Gaoliang Yang
Institute of Materials Research and Engineering, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 2 Fusionopolis Way, Innovis, Singapore 138634, Singapore
Wei Ying Lieu
Institute of Materials Research and Engineering, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 2 Fusionopolis Way, Innovis, Singapore 138634, Singapore
Deviprasath Chinnadurai
Institute of Materials Research and Engineering, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 2 Fusionopolis Way, Innovis, Singapore 138634, Singapore
Zhi Wei Seh
Institute of Materials Research and Engineering, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 2 Fusionopolis Way, Innovis, Singapore 138634, Singapore

Corresponding Author: Zhi Wei Seh

sehzw@imre.a-star.edu.sg

Nano-Micro Letters, Vol. 15 (2023), Article Number: 21

Abstract

Rechargeable Al batteries (RAB) are promising candidates for safe and environmentally sustainable battery systems with low-cost investments. However, the currently used aluminum chloride-based electrolytes present a significant challenge to commercialization due to their corrosive nature. Here, we report for the first time, a novel electrolyte combination for RAB based on aluminum trifluoromethanesulfonate (Al(OTf)3) with tetrabutylammonium chloride (TBAC) additive in diglyme. The presence of a mere 0.1 M of TBAC in the Al(OTf)3 electrolyte generates the charge carrying electrochemical species, which forms the basis of reaction at the electrodes. TBAC reduces the charge transfer resistance and the surface activation energy at the anode surface and also augments the dissociation of Al(OTf)3 to generate the solid electrolyte interphase components. Our electrolyte's superiority directly translates into reduced anodic overpotential for cells that ran for 1300 cycles in Al plating/stripping tests, the longest cycling life reported to date. This unique combination of salt and additive is non-corrosive, exhibits a high flash point and is cheaper than traditionally reported RAB electrolyte combinations, which makes it commercially promising. Through this report, we address a major roadblock in the commercialization of RAB and inspire equivalent electrolyte fabrication approaches for other metal anode batteries.


Highlights:


1 A unique electrolyte combination for rechargeable aluminum battery was fabricated using aluminum trifluoromethanesulfonate as the main salt and tetrabutylammonium chloride as an additive.
2 The presence of additive activates the Al-anode surface toward plating/stripping and aids in the formation of a protective solid electrolyte interphase layer on the anode, resulting in a substantially suppressed anodic overpotential for 1300 cycles.
3 The cheap, high flash point and non-corrosive nature of the electrolyte makes it commercially promising.

Keywords

Aluminum-ion batteries Solid electrolyte interphase Electrolyte additives Non-aqueous electrolytes
Kumar, Sonal, Prasad Rama, Gaoliang Yang, Wei Ying Lieu, Deviprasath Chinnadurai, and Zhi Wei Seh. 2022. “Additive-Driven Interfacial Engineering of Aluminum Metal Anode for Ultralong Cycling Life”. Nano-Micro Letters 15 (December):21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-01000-6.
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. A.Y.S. Eng, C.B. Soni, Y. Lum, E. Khoo, Z. Yao et al., Theory-guided experimental design in battery materials research. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm2422 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abm2422
  2. D.B. Agusdinata, W. Liu, H. Eakin, H. Romero, Socio-environmental impacts of lithium mineral extraction: towards a research agenda. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 123001 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aae9b1
  3. C. Helbig, A.M. Bradshaw, L. Wietschel, A. Thorenz, A. Tuma, Supply risks associated with lithium-ion battery materials. J. Clean. Prod. 172, 274 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.122
  4. P. Canepa, G. Sai Gautam, D.C. Hannah, R. Malik, M. Liu et al., Odyssey of multivalent cathode materials: open questions and future challenges. Chem. Rev. 117, 4287 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00614
  5. S. Kumar, V. Verma, H. Arora, W. Manalastas, M. Srinivasan, Rechargeable Al-metal aqueous battery using namnhcf as a cathode: investigating the role of coated-al anode treatments for superior battery cycling performance. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 3, 8627 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.0c01240
  6. S. Kumar, T. Salim, V. Verma, W. Manalastas, M. Srinivasan, Enabling al-metal anodes for aqueous electrochemical cells by using low-cost eutectic mixtures as artificial protective interphase. Chem. Eng. J. 435, 134742 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.134742
  7. D.J. Kim, D.-J. Yoo, M.T. Otley, A. Prokofjevs, C. Pezzato et al., Rechargeable aluminium organic batteries. Nat. Energy 4, 51 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0291-0
  8. Q. Pang, J. Meng, S. Gupta, X. Hong, C.Y. Kwok et al., Fast-charging aluminium–chalcogen batteries resistant to dendritic shorting. Nature 608, 704 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04983-9
  9. Y. Hu, H. Huang, D. Yu, X. Wang, L. Li et al., All-climate aluminum-ion batteries based on binder-free mof-derived FeS2@C/CNT cathode. Nano-Micro Lett. 13, 159 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-021-00682-8
  10. F. Wang, M. Jiang, T. Zhao, P. Meng, J. Ren et al., Atomically dispersed iron active sites promoting reversible redox kinetics and suppressing shuttle effect in aluminum–sulfur batteries. Nano-Micro Lett. 14, 169 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00915-4
  11. S.K. Das, S. Mahapatra, H. Lahan, Aluminium-ion batteries: developments and challenges. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 6347 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA00228A
  12. M.-C. Lin, M. Gong, B. Lu, Y. Wu, D.-Y. Wang et al., An ultrafast rechargeable aluminium-ion battery. Nature 520, 324 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14340
  13. S. Hess, M. Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, M. Wachtler, Flammability of li-ion battery electrolytes: flash point and self-extinguishing time measurements. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, A3084 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0121502jes
  14. F. Wu, H. Yang, Y. Bai, C. Wu, Paving the path toward reliable cathode materials for aluminum-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 31, 1806510 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201806510
  15. Z. Hu, H. Zhang, H. Wang, F. Zhang, Q. Li et al., Nonaqueous aluminum ion batteries: recent progress and prospects. ACS Mater. Lett. 2, 887 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c00208
  16. K.L. Ng, B. Amrithraj, G. Azimi, Nonaqueous rechargeable aluminum batteries. Joule 6, 134 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2021.12.003
  17. T. Mandai, P. Johansson, Al conductive haloaluminate-free non-aqueous room-temperature electrolytes. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 12230 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA01760B
  18. L.D. Reed, A. Arteaga, E.J. Menke, A combined experimental and computational study of an aluminum triflate/diglyme electrolyte. J. Phys. Chem. B 119, 12677 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b08501
  19. L.D. Reed, S.N. Ortiz, M. Xiong, E.J. Menke, A rechargeable aluminum-ion battery utilizing a copper hexacyanoferrate cathode in an organic electrolyte. Chem. Commun. 51, 14397 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CC06053B
  20. T. Mandai, P. Johansson, Haloaluminate-free cationic aluminum complexes: structural characterization and physicochemical properties. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 21285 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b07235
  21. M. Chiku, S. Matsumura, H. Takeda, E. Higuchi, H. Inoue, Aluminum bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide as a chloride-free electrolyte for rechargeable aluminum batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, A1841 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0701709jes
  22. X. Wen, J. Zhang, H. Luo, J. Shi, C. Tsay et al., Synthesis and electrochemical properties of aluminum hexafluorophosphate. J. Phys. Chem. 12, 5903 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c01236
  23. Z. Slim, E.J. Menke, Aluminum electrodeposition from chloride-rich and chloride-free organic electrolytes. J. Phys. Chem. C 126, 2365 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c09126
  24. Z. Slim, E.J. Menke, Comparing computational predictions and experimental results for aluminum triflate in tetrahydrofuran. J. Phys. Chem. B 124, 5002 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c02570
  25. C. Yan, C. Lv, B.-E. Jia, L. Zhong, X. Cao et al., Reversible al metal anodes enabled by amorphization for aqueous aluminum batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 11444 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c04820
  26. Q. Ran, H. Shi, H. Meng, S.-P. Zeng, W.-B. Wan et al., Aluminum-copper alloy anode materials for high-energy aqueous aluminum batteries. Nat. Commun. 13, 576 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28238-3
  27. L. Fu, X. Wang, Z. Chen, Y. Li, E. Mao et al., Insights on “nitrate salt” in lithium anode for stabilized solid electrolyte interphase. Carbon Energy 4, 12 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/cey2.169
  28. A. Zhou, L. Jiang, J. Yue, Y. Tong, Q. Zhang et al., Water-in-salt electrolyte promotes high capacity FeFe(CN)6 cathode for aqueous al-ion battery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 41356 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b14149
  29. R. Horia, D.-T. Nguyen, A.Y.S. Eng, Z.W. Seh, Using a chloride-free magnesium battery electrolyte to form a robust anode–electrolyte nanointerface. Nano Lett. 21, 8220 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c02655
  30. D.-T. Nguyen, A.Y.S. Eng, R. Horia, Z. Sofer, A.D. Handoko et al., Rechargeable magnesium batteries enabled by conventional electrolytes with multifunctional organic chloride additives. Energy Storage Mater. 45, 1120 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2021.11.011
  31. Y. Liu, S. Sang, Q. Wu, Z. Lu, K. Liu et al., The electrochemical behavior of Cl− assisted Al3+ insertion into titanium dioxide nanotube arrays in aqueous solution for aluminum ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 143, 340 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2014.08.016
  32. H.J. Lee, I.J. Park, S.R. Choi, J.G. Kim, Effect of chloride on anodic dissolution of aluminum in 4 m naoh solution for aluminum-air battery. ECS Trans. 75, 117 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1149/07518.0117ecst
  33. P. Rama, A.R. Bhattacharyya, R. Bandyopadhyaya, A.S. Panwar, Ion valence and concentration effects on the interaction between polystyrene sulfonate-modified carbon nanotubes in water. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 9619 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10467
  34. P. Rama, A.R. Bhattacharyya, R. Bandyopadhyaya, A.S. Panwar, Tunable energy barrier for intercalation of a carbon nanotube into graphene nanosheets: a molecular dynamics study of a hybrid self-assembly. J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 1974 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b10958
  35. S. Kumar, P. Rama, A.S. Panwar, Scaling relations for the interactions between curved graphene sheets in water. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 30217 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CP05005D
  36. Lindahl, Abraham, Hess, V.D. Spoel, Gromacs 2021.5 source code. Zenodo. (2022). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5850051
  37. S. Kim, J. Lee, S. Jo, C.L. Brooks Iii, H.S. Lee et al., Charmm-gui ligand reader and modeler for charmm force field generation of small molecules. J. Comput. Chem. 38, 1879 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.24829
  38. S. Jo, T. Kim, V.G. Iyer, W. Im, Charmm-gui: a web-based graphical user interface for charmm. J. Comput. Chem. 29, 1859 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20945
  39. H.J.C. Berendsen, J.P.M. Postma, W.F. van Gunsteren, A. DiNola, J.R. Haak, Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3684 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.448118
  40. A. Pei, G. Zheng, F. Shi, Y. Li, Y. Cui, Nanoscale nucleation and growth of electrodeposited lithium metal. Nano Lett. 17, 1132 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04755
  41. P. Biswal, S. Stalin, A. Kludze, S. Choudhury, L.A. Archer, Nucleation and early stage growth of li electrodeposits. Nano Lett. 19, 8191 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03548
  42. Y.-X. Yao, X.-Q. Zhang, B.-Q. Li, C. Yan, P.-Y. Chen et al., A compact inorganic layer for robust anode protection in lithium-sulfur batteries. InfoMat 2, 379 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/inf2.12046
  43. G.G. Eshetu, S. Grugeon, S. Laruelle, S. Boyanov, A. Lecocq et al., In-depth safety-focused analysis of solvents used in electrolytes for large scale lithium ion batteries. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 9145 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CP51315G
  44. H. Wang, S. Gu, Y. Bai, S. Chen, N. Zhu et al., Anion-effects on electrochemical properties of ionic liquid electrolytes for rechargeable aluminum batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 22677 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA06187C
  45. A.S. Keefe, S. Buteau, I.G. Hill, J.R. Dahn, Temperature dependent eis studies separating charge transfer impedance from contact impedance in lithium-ion symmetric cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 166, A3272 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0541914jes
  46. J. Grondin, L. Ducasse, J.-L. Bruneel, L. Servant, J.-C. Lassègues, Vibrational and theoretical study of the complexation of LiPF6 and LiClO4 by di(ethylene glycol) dimethyl ether. Solid State Ionics 166, 441 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2003.11.007
  47. P. Johansson, J. Grondin, J.-C. Lassègues, Structural and vibrational properties of diglyme and longer glymes. J. Phys. Chem. A 114, 10700 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp105437d
  48. M. Angell, G. Zhu, M.-C. Lin, Y. Rong, H. Dai, Ionic liquid analogs of AlCl3 with urea derivatives as electrolytes for aluminum batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1901928 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201901928
  49. Y.-C. Kim, H.-H. Park, J.S. Chun, W.-J. Lee, Compositional and structural analysis of aluminum oxide films prepared by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. Thin Solid Films 237, 57 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6090(94)90238-0
  50. Y. Okamoto, K. Nagata, T. Adachi, T. Imanaka, K. Inamura et al., ion and characterization of highly dispersed cobalt oxide and sulfide catalysts supported on silica. J. Phys. Chem. 95, 310 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1021/j100154a057
  51. G. Mattogno, G. Righini, G. Montesperelli, E. Traversa, XPS analysis of the interface of ceramic thin films for humidity sensors. Appl. Surf. Sci. 70, 363 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-4332(93)90459-O
  52. G. Mattogno, G. Righini, G. Montesperelli, E. Traversa, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy investigation of mgal2o4 thin films for humidity sensors. J. Mater. Res. 9, 1426 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1994.1426
  53. S.L. Chang, J.W. Anderegg, P.A. Thiel, Surface oxidation of an AlPdMn quasicrystal, characterized by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 195, 95 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3093(95)00537-4
  54. T.J. Carney, P. Tsakiropoulos, J.F. Watts, J.E. Castle, Oxidation and surface segregation in rapidly solidified aluminum alloy powders. Intern. J. Rapid Solidif. 5, 189 (1990)
  55. R. Hauert, J. Patscheider, M. Tobler, R. Zehringer, XPS investigation of the a-c : H/Al interface. Surf. Sci. 292, 121 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028(93)90395-Z
  56. K. Hirakawa, Y. Hashimoto, T. Ikoma, Orientation independence of heterojunction-band offsets at gaas-alas heterointerfaces characterized by X-ray photoemission spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 2555 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.103815
  57. J.R. Araujo, B.S. Archanjo, K.R. de Souza, W. Kwapinski, N.P.S. Falcão et al., Selective extraction of humic acids from an anthropogenic amazonian dark earth and from a chemically oxidized charcoal. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 50, 1223 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-014-0940-9
  58. J.C. Lascovich, S. Scaglione, Comparison among xaes, pels and XPS techniques for evaluation of sp2 percentage in a-c:H. Appl. Surf. Sci. 78, 17 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-4332(94)90026-4
  59. H. Hantsche, High resolution XPS of organic polymers, the scienta esca300 database. By G. Beamson and D. Briggs, wiley, chichester 1992, 295 pp., hardcover, £ 65.00, isbn 0–471–93592–1. Adv. Mater. 5, 778 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.19930051035
  60. J. Escard, G. Mavel, J.E. Guerchais, R. Kergoat, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study of some metal(ii) halide and pseudohalide complexes. Inorg. Chem. 13, 695 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1021/ic50133a036
  61. H. Nie, M. Li, Q. Li, S. Liang, Y. Tan et al., Carbon dots with continuously tunable full-color emission and their application in ratiometric ph sensing. Chem. Mater. 26, 3104 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/cm5003669
  62. M. Davies, High resolution XPS of organic polymers: The scienta esca300 database: G. Beamson and D. Briggs john wiley, chichester, uk 1992. Biomaterial 15, 318 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(94)90060-4
  63. E. Kemnitz, A. Kohne, I. Grohmann, A. Lippitz, W.E.S. Unger, X-ray photoelectron and X-ray excited auger electron spectroscopic analysis of surface modifications of chromia during heterogeneous catalyzed chlorine/fluorine exchange. J. Catal. 159, 270 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.1996.0088
  64. A.K. Friedman, W. Shi, Y. Losovyj, A.R. Siedle, L.A. Baker, Mapping microscale chemical heterogeneity in nafion membranes with x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, H733 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0771811jes
  65. J. Kim, M.R. Raj, G. Lee, High-defect-density graphite for superior-performance aluminum-ion batteries with ultra-fast charging and stable long life. Nano-Micro Lett. 13, 171 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-021-00698-0
  66. M. Angell, C.-J. Pan, Y. Rong, C. Yuan, M.-C. Lin et al., High coulombic efficiency aluminum-ion battery using an AlCl3-urea ionic liquid analog electrolyte. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 834 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1619795114
  67. X. Dong, H. Xu, H. Chen, L. Wang, J. Wang et al., Commercial expanded graphite as high-performance cathode for low-cost aluminum-ion battery. Carbon 148, 134 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.03.080
  68. S. Guo, H. Yang, M. Liu, X. Feng, Y. Gao et al., Al-storage behaviors of expanded graphite as high-rate and long-life cathode materials for rechargeable aluminum batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 22549 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c04466
  69. M. Elsharkawi, A.M.K. Esawi, Development of an AlCl3-urea ionic liquid for the electroless deposition of aluminum on carbon nanotubes. ACS Omega 5, 5756 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b03805
  70. N. Lindahl, J. Bitenc, R. Dominko, P. Johansson, Aluminum metal–organic batteries with integrated 3d thin film anodes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 2004573 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202004573
  71. J. Bitenc, N. Lindahl, A. Vizintin, M.E. Abdelhamid, R. Dominko et al., Concept and electrochemical mechanism of an al metal anode—organic cathode battery. Energy Storage Mater. 24, 379 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2019.07.033
  72. F. Guo, Z. Huang, M. Wang, W.-L. Song, A. Lv et al., Active cyano groups to coordinate AlCl2+ cation for rechargeable aluminum batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 33, 250 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2020.08.016
  73. M. Mao, Z. Yu, Z. Lin, Y.-S. Hu, H. Li et al., Simplifying and accelerating kinetics enabling fast-charge al batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 23834 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TA08348H
  74. C. Pan, M. Shin, D. Liu, M. Kottwitz, R. Zhang et al., Energy storage mechanisms in high-capacity graphitic C3N4 cathodes for al-ion batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 10288 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c00259
  75. J. Zhou, X. Yu, J. Zhou, B. Lu, Polyimide/metal-organic framework hybrid for high performance Al-organic battery. Energy Storage Mater. 31, 58 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2020.05.029
Read More
Author biographies are not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
Statistic
Read Counter : 2659 Download : 1976